- Poster Presentation
- Open Access
Normative Visual Development: efficient coding principles for adult V1 predict properties of LGN waves prior to eye opening
© Albert and Field; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Published: 20 July 2010
We present a novel approach to understanding spontaneous activity in the LGN and V1 prior to natural visual experience. Patterned, spontaneous neural activity has been measured in these areas but is poorly understood in comparison to work on retinal waves . Our predictions about LGN/V1 spontaneous activity not only have implications for future experiments, but provide an additional computational-level interpretation. In the same way that V1 can be understood through neural network receptive field models (Marr's algorithmic level) as well as an efficient coding of natural images (Marr's computational level), we propose that early visual spontaneous activity can be understood not only through neural network models of receptive field and map formation, as in many previous approaches [2, 3], but also by how this activity relates to the high-level coding objectives of V1.
The key insight in this work is that the form of spontaneous activity in the early visual system can be constrained by these normative principles to resemble measured spontaneous activity patterns. The neural code in fully-developed adult primary visual cortex (V1) is presumed to be an efficient code; by encoding images of our natural visual environment, techniques such as sparse coding  and independent components analysis  have produced linear filters which resemble experimentally measured receptive fields in V1. Our simulations show how patterns which qualitatively resemble such activity are capable of producing these V1-like visual codes by using the same learning algorithms. The spontaneous activity model is similar to a previous abstracted version of retinal wave generation  with the addition of multiple eye-layers and correlated interaction between the layers as has been measured experimentally . All model parameters have a direct physiological interpretation and also relate to theoretical models used in the physics of critical phenomena (e.g. percolation networks). This normative approach demonstrates that binocular disparity-selective cells can be refined by spontaneous activity in a way that promotes early stereopsis. This unique, normative approach to visual development provides a way of applying the tools of efficient coding used in the adult visual system to better understand how the how V1 refines prior to visual experience.
We thank Risto Miikkulainen for his helpful comments. This research was supported by National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency contract HM 1582-05-C-0007 to DJF and an NSF graduate research fellowship to MVA.
- Huberman AD, Feller MB, Chapman B: Mechanisms underlying development of visual maps and receptive fields. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008, 31: 479-509. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125533.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Swindale NV: The development of topography in the visual cortex: a review of models. Network. 1996, 7 (2): 161-247. 10.1088/0954-898X/7/2/002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miikkulainen R, Bednar JA, Choe Y, Sirosh J: Computational Maps in the Visual Cortex. 2005, SpringerGoogle Scholar
- Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ: The "independent components" of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision Research. 1997, 37 (23): 3327-3338. 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00121-1.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olshausen BA, Field DJ: Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature. 1996, 381 (6583): 607-609. 10.1038/381607a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Albert MV, Schnabel A, Field DJ: Innate visual learning through spontaneous activity patterns. PLoS Computational Biology. 2008, 4 (8): 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000137.Google Scholar
- Weliky M, Katz LC: Correlational structure of spontaneous neuronal activity in the developing lateral geniculate nucleus in vivo. Science. 1999, 285 (5427): 599-604. 10.1126/science.285.5427.599.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.