ERP correlates of intramodal and crossmodal L2 acquisition

BMC Neuroscience

Table 5 Group comparisons for the semantic condition.

Group Comparisons Semantics		time epoch
groups	effects	300-500 ms		600-800 mss
		F	p	F	p
h-L1/h-L2	GR,CO	0.007	0.932	0.527	0.475
	GR,CO,HE	0.957	0.339	8.136°^	0.009°^
	GR,CO,CL	0.502	0.593	0.691	0.524
	GR,CO,HE,CL	1.847	0.161	3.178°^	0.044°^
		F	p	F	p
h-L1/d-L2	GR,CO	0.360	0.556	0.357	0.558
	GR,CO,HE	1.687	0.210	0.107	0.747
	GR,CO,CL	0.086	0.936	0.222	0.792
	GR,CO,HE,CL	2.485	0.088	0.519	0.619
		F	p	F	p
h-L2/d-L2	GR,CO	0.449	0.511	1.621	0.219
	GR,CO,HE	0.100	0.756	3.100	0.095
	GR,CO,CL	0.103	0.894	1.242	0.302
	GR,CO,HE,CL	0.474	0.640	1.232	0.304

GR: Group, CO: Condition, HE: Hemisphere, CL: Cluster; p < 0.05; p < 0.01; p < 0.001
°: confirmed with z-score standardized values; ^: confirmed with normalized values
The results of the Group by Condition by Hemisphere by Cluster ANOVAs that included the factors Group and Condition are listed for the time epochs 300-500 ms and 600-800 ms for all group comparisons. Effects that were confirmed after z-standardization/vector normalization are indicated with a °/^ respectively.

ISSN: 1471-2202