Loss of IP3 receptor function in neuropeptide secreting neurons leads to obesity in adult Drosophila
- Manivannan Subramanian†1, 2,
- Siddharth Jayakumar†1, 3,
- Shlesha Richhariya1 and
- Gaiti Hasan1Email author
© Subramanian et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 23 September 2013
Accepted: 5 December 2013
Published: 18 December 2013
Intracellular calcium signaling regulates a variety of cellular and physiological processes. The inositol 1,4,5 trisphosphate receptor (IP3R) is a ligand gated calcium channel present on the membranes of endoplasmic reticular stores. In previous work we have shown that Drosophila mutants for the IP3R (itpr ku ) become unnaturally obese as adults with excessive storage of lipids on a normal diet. While the phenotype manifests in cells of the fat body, genetic studies suggest dysregulation of a neurohormonal axis.
We show that knockdown of the IP3R, either in all neurons or in peptidergic neurons alone, mimics known itpr mutant phenotypes. The peptidergic neuron domain includes, but is not restricted to, the medial neurosecretory cells as well as the stomatogastric nervous system. Conversely, expression of an itpr + cDNA in the same set of peptidergic neurons rescues metabolic defects of itpr ku mutants. Transcript levels of a gene encoding a gastric lipase CG5932 (magro), which is known to regulate triacylglyceride storage, can be regulated by itpr knockdown and over-expression in peptidergic neurons. Thus, the focus of observed itpr mutant phenotypes of starvation resistance, increased body weight, elevated lipid storage and hyperphagia derive primarily from peptidergic neurons.
The present study shows that itpr function in peptidergic neurons is not only necessary but also sufficient for maintaining normal lipid metabolism in Drosophila. Our results suggest that intracellular calcium signaling in peptidergic neurons affects lipid metabolism by both cell autonomous and non-autonomous mechanisms.
Calcium is a key signaling molecule in multi-cellular organisms that regulates a variety of cellular processes [1, 2]. The IP3R (Inositol 1,4,5 trisphosphate Receptor) is a ligand gated calcium channel present on the membranes of endoplasmic reticular (ER) stores. It mediates the release of ER calcium upon binding of its cognate ligand IP3. In Drosophila there is a single gene, itpr, for the IP3R which is 60% homologous to mammalian IP3R1 . Previous studies have shown that expression of the Drosophila IP3R is widespread in all tissues and cell types examined [4, 5]. However, depending on their allelic strength, itpr mutants exhibit relatively specific metabolic and neuronal phenotypes. Hetero-allelic combinations of strong itpr mutants exhibit metabolic defects, altered feeding and transcriptional changes in metabolic gene pathways during larval stages [6, 7]. itpr ka1091 and itpr ug3 are point mutations in the modulatory domain (Gly 1891 Ser), and in the ligand binding (Ser 224 Phe) domain respectively of the IP3R. These mutants are lethal as homozygotes, while their hetero-allelic combination (itpr ka1091/ug3 or itpr ku ) is adult viable . Recently, we demonstrated the presence of metabolic changes in itpr ku adult animals leading to starvation resistance, increased body weight, elevated TAGs and hyperphagia .
In mammals, disorders like type 2 diabetes, coronary heart disease, respiratory complications and osteoarthritis are a result of altered fat metabolism . The complexity of these diseases arises in part from regulation of fat metabolism through the interaction of signaling pathways involving multiple tissues and organs. Genetic studies in model organisms help understand aspects of this complexity. In Drosophila, fat metabolism is essential for maintaining energy homeostasis. Nutrient fat in the form of Triacylglycerides (TAGs) is broken down to fatty acids in the mid-gut, absorbed and re-synthesized as TAGs in the fat bodies . Perturbations in fat metabolism can lead to changes in TAG levels and consequent obesity [11, 12]. Lipids stored in fat body cells are utilized under stress conditions and the storage and mobilization of lipids to target tissues is tightly regulated, based on energy requirements. This requires communication between the gut, fat body cells and oenocytes, the cells analogous to the mammalian liver in Drosophila. Furthermore, signals from the brain coordinate feeding behavior as well as the utilization of stored TAGs, finally affecting the body weight of an organism [14–16]. Based on the obese and hyperphagic phenotypes of itpr ku it appears that calcium release by the IP3R helps maintain this axis of lipid metabolism and feeding in Drosophila. Here we show that peptidergic neurons are an important focus of IP3R function in the context of metabolic control.
The IP3R affects Drosophilametabolism through its function in peptidergic neurons
In order to test if lack of starvation resistance with IP3R knockdown in Dilp2 neurons, arose due to insufficient knockdown, we expressed a GFP tagged IP3R transgene (UAS-itprGFP) in both Dilp2 neurons and peptidergic neurons marked by dimmGAL4. These strains were tested for the extent of GFP fluorescence in the presence and absence of IP3R knockdown by dsitpr. GFP expression was abrogated in the DILP neurons with both drivers indicating efficient knock-down (Figure 1B). Thus, IP3R knockdown is essential in multiple peptidergic neurons for generating starvation resistance. Concurrently, when an itpr + cDNA was over-expressed in either all neurons or peptidergic neurons in the background of itpr ku , the rescued animals displayed a viability profile similar to that of controls (Figure 1C).
Pan-neuronal knock down of the IP3R also lead to elevated levels of TAGs in the abdomen at 144 hrs after feeding. Moreover, in flies with itpr knockdown using pan-neuronal and peptidergic GAL4s the TAG levels are high even after starvation for 72 hrs. The fat body knockdown of itpr animals also have slightly but significantly higher TAG levels post starvation (Figure 2B). This result agrees with the partial rescue of the elevated TAGs of itpr ku by over expression of itpr + exclusively in the fat body observed previously . On the other hand, over expression of itpr + in the peptidergic neurons alone completely rescues the elevated TAGs post feeding and starvation (Figure 2B). These data suggest that itpr function in peptidergic neurons is both necessary and sufficient for maintaining the level of stored TAGs in fat body cells of adult Drosophila.
IP3R function in peptidergic neurons regulates food intake
IP3R function in peptidergic neurons affects transcription of a gut lipase
For obese and hyperphagic animals, excess storage of TAGs is likely to be accompanied by altered levels of lipid metabolizing enzymes in the gut. Magro, encoded by CG5932, is the Drosophila homolog of mammalian gastric lipase, LipA and is expressed in the anterior part of the gut and released into the intestine to digest TAGs. Levels of Magro have been shown to modulate TAG levels as knocking down Magro shows reduction in TAG levels . itpr ku mutants have elevated levels of TAGs as well as elevated levels of magro. Since peptidergic knockdown of itpr phenocopies the itpr ku mutant, transcript levels of the gastric lipase magro were measured from isolated guts of appropriate genotypes (Figure 5C). magro expression in guts from flies with knockdown of the IP3R in peptidergic neurons appears significantly elevated. Moreover, expression of itpr + in peptidergic neurons of itpr ku animals could rescue the elevated levels of magro transcripts (Figure 5C). Thus, IP3R mediated signals in peptidergic neurons appear to regulate magro transcription in the gut in a manner that is not yet understood.
Discussion and conclusions
Insulin-like peptides (ILPs), which are secreted by a subset of the medial neurosecretory cells in the brain (Figure 1), regulate lipid homeostasis in the fat body cells of adult Drosophila[22, 23]. The obese phenotype observed in adult itpr mutants suggested a role for IP3 mediated calcium signaling in modulating ILP release and secretion. However, significant differences were observed between the phenotypes of itpr mutant animals rescued by expression of an itpr + cDNA as compared with rescue by over-expression of Drosophila ILP2, suggesting that IP3R mutants affect a broader axis of neurohormonal control than the one defined by insulin signaling . IP3-mediated calcium signaling and its modulation of the neurohormonal axis, leading to obesity, have now been investigated in greater detail. The ILP secreting medial neurosecretory cells also secrete a number of other neuropeptides, which regulate stress and metabolism in Drosophila[24, 25]. While it is possible that these neuropeptides, in addition to the ILPs, contribute to the itpr mutant phenotype of obesity this seems unlikely because knockdown of the IP3R in neurons which secrete ILPs and additional neuropeptides (the DILP neurons) had no effect on starvation resistance and obesity in itpr mutants. The peptidergic neurons, defined by dimmGAL4, include the DILP neurons plus other neurosecretory cells in the brain . Because knockdown of the IP3R in peptidergic neurons phenocopied the itpr mutant, and restoring itpr function specifically in peptidergic neurons rescued mutant phenotypes, we conclude that IP3R function and Ca2+ release affects lipid metabolism primarily through regulation of neuropeptide secretion. The composite phenotypes of hyperphagia and obesity in IP3R mutants and peptidergic knockdown animals suggest a role for these neuropeptides in regulation of feeding and TAG storage and utilisation in the fatbody. Our data support the idea that feeding and lipid mobilisation are regulated by non-overlapping sets of neurosecretory cells, possibly comprising the mNSCs which regulate TAG utilisation in the fatbody, and other neuropeptide secreting cells such as the neurons of the stomatogastric system, which regulate satiety and feeding. Moreover, it is likely that feedback mechanisms exist between these two groups of neurons such that knockdown of the IP3R in one set can be compensated by the other, as in the case of knockdown in the DILP neurons. A recent study revealed the role of drosulfakinin (DSK), a neuropeptide expressed in the DILP neurons in feeding and satiety . The target cells of DSK are not known and in the light of our observations, we hypothesize that these might be peptidergic neurons of the stomatogastric nervous system. Indeed, axonal projections from the mNSCs have been shown to target the proventriculus and midgut in both larval and adult animals . Thus, when IP3R knockdown affects both sets of neurons, as in dimmGAL4 knockdown and in itpr mutants, it is likely that such feedback mechanisms are abrogated. As a consequence despite the existence of sufficient TAG stores in the fatbody the animals continue to feed excessively, leading to a further increase in TAG deposits and obesity.
The altered neurohormonal axis created by knockdown of itpr in peptidergic neurons, and in itpr ku mutants, leads to non-cell autonomous effects such as up-regulation of the gastric lipase CG5932 (magro) which has been previously reported to be expressed mainly in the proventriculus and then delivered to the intestinal lumen . Our data support the idea that magro transcription is regulated by neuropeptides released from the stomatogastric nervous system (SNS). Stimuli received by the SNS are likely to derive from elevated feeding and body TAG levels. A similar neurohormonal gut brain axis is known to exist in mammals in which the vagus nerve which innervates the gastro-intestinal tract plays a role in regulating feeding, satiety and nutrient absorption [15, 26] and responds to the orexin neuropeptides . A better understanding of signaling mechanisms that regulate interactions between these axes is likely to help in devising new therapeutic measures for human obesity.
itpr RNAi experiments utilized the UAS-dsitpr strain (1063R-2) obtained from the National Institute of Genetics, Kyoto, Japan. The UAS-itprGFP strain used was from Srikanth et al., 2006 . itpr ka1091/ug3 (itpr ku ) is a heteroallelic combination of single point mutants in the itpr gene that were generated in an EMS (ethyl methane sulfonate) screen . The embryonic wild-type itpr cDNA (UASitpr + )  was used for rescue experiments. UASmCD8-GFP (II) used was obtained from the Bloomington Stock Centre, Bloomington, IN. GAL4 strains used were a fat body GAL4,c729GAL4, a Dilp2 neuronal GAL4,Dilp2GAL4, a pan-neuronal GAL4, elav C155 GAL4 and a peptidergic neuron GAL4, dimmGAL4.
Flies were grown on normal food (80 g of corn flour, 20 g of D-Glucose, 40 g of sucrose, 8 g of agar and 15 g of yeast extract in a total volume of 1 litre). They were aged on the same food for 3 days and the starvation assay was carried out as described in .
Adult brains of the specified genotypes were dissected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. A rabbit anti-GFP primary antibody (1:10,000; #A6455, Molecular Probes, Eugene, USA) was used with a rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 secondary (1:400; #A1108) to probe for levels of UASitprGFP + . The samples were mounted in 60% glycerol and confocal images were acquired using an Olympus FV1000 Confocal Microscope and viewed using FV10-ASW 3.0 viewer (Olympus Corporation, Japan).
Oil red staining of neutral lipids
For Oil Red O staining, guts were fixed in PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde. They were incubated for 20 to 30 min in 0.1% Oil Red O (Sigma, St. Louis, USA), washed in PBS and mounted in 60% glycerol. Photographs were obtained on an Olympus BX60 Microscope with an Evolution VF camera (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, USA).
TAGs were estimated with a Triglyceride reagent kit (GPO-ESPAS, Ranbaxy Diagnostic Limited, India) in homogenates from Drosophila abdomens and were normalized to protein levels as described in . Total protein was estimated from the same homogenate using a BCA kit from Sigma-Aldrich.
Quantification of feeding assay
Freshly eclosed flies were collected and aged for 3 days on normal food, starved for 24 hours and transferred into vials containing 1.2% red dye (Chromotrope FB, Sigma), 1% agar and 100 mM sucrose. They were allowed to feed in a dark chamber for 2 hours post which the intake of red dye was monitored from abdominal lysates of three independent batches, as described in .
RNA isolation and qRT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from ~5 guts of the indicated genotypes dissected in PBS for each sample. RNA isolation was performed using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Life technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was dissolved in nuclease free water and quantified using a NanoDrop machine (Thermo scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA), and the integrity was checked on a 1.5% TAE gel. Approximately 500 ng of RNA was used for cDNA preparation by Reverse Transcription as described in . qPCR was performed on an ABI 7500 fast machine operated with ABI 7500 software using MESA GREEN qPCR Master MIX Plus for SYBR Assay I dTTP (Eurogentec, Belgium). Each qPCR experiment was repeated three times with independently isolated RNA samples at 1:10 dilution. rp49 was used as the internal control. A melt curve was performed after the assay to check for specificity of the reaction. The fold change of gene expression in the mutant relative to wild-type was determined by the comparative DDCt method . In this method the fold change is 2-DDCt where DDCt = (Ct (target gene) –Ct (rp49))mutant - (Ct (target gene) – Ct (rp49))Wild type.
Sequences of the primer used are as follows:
Rp49: F- 5′-CGGATCGATATGCTAAGCTGT-3′ R- 5′-GCGCTTGTTCGATCCGTA-3′
CG5932: F-5′-GCAGCACGGATTGTTCAGTAA-3′ R-5′-CTGTTCAGCGAGATGATGATG-3′
Computations of means, standard error of the mean (SEM) and students t-tests were performed using Origin 7.5. All error bars in all figures represent SEM.
We thank Suman Kumar Metya for performing the TAG assay in dsitpr knockdown flies and Afrin Jahan for help with some starvation assays. This work was supported by grants from the Dept. of Biotechnology and Dept. of Science and Technology, Govt. of India to GH. MS was supported by an ICMR fellowship, SJ by a CSIR fellowship and SR by grant from NCBS, TIFR.
- Cai X: Unicellular Ca2+ signaling ‘toolkit’ at the origin of metazoa. Mol Biol Evol. 2008, 25 (7): 1357-1361. 10.1093/molbev/msn077.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Berridge MJ: Inositol trisphosphate and calcium signalling. Nature. 1993, 361 (6410): 315-325. 10.1038/361315a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hasan G, Rosbash M: Drosophila homologs of two mammalian intracellular Ca(2+)-release channels: identification and expression patterns of the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate and the ryanodine receptor genes. Development. 1992, 116 (4): 967-975.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raghu P, Hasan G: The inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor expression in Drosophila suggests a role for IP3 signalling in muscle development and adult chemosensory functions. Dev Biol. 1995, 171 (2): 564-577. 10.1006/dbio.1995.1305.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Venkatesh K, Siddhartha G, Joshi R, Patel S, Hasan G: Interactions between the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and cyclic AMP signaling pathways regulate larval molting in Drosophila. Genetics. 2001, 158 (1): 309-318.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Agrawal N, Padmanabhan N, Hasan G: Inositol 1,4,5- trisphosphate receptor function in Drosophila insulin producing cells. PLoS One. 2009, 4 (8): e6652-10.1371/journal.pone.0006652.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kumar S, Dey D, Hasan G: Patterns of gene expression in Drosophila InsP3 receptor mutant larvae reveal a role for InsP3 signaling in carbohydrate and energy metabolism. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (8): e24105-10.1371/journal.pone.0024105.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Joshi R, Venkatesh K, Srinivas R, Nair S, Hasan G: Genetic dissection of itpr gene function reveals a vital requirement in aminergic cells of Drosophila larvae. Genetics. 2004, 166 (1): 225-236. 10.1534/genetics.166.1.225.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Subramanian M, Metya SK, Sadaf S, Kumar S, Schwudke D, Hasan G: Altered lipid homeostasis in Drosophila InsP3 receptor mutants leads to obesity and hyperphagia. Dis Model Mech. 2013, 6 (3): 734-744. 10.1242/dmm.010017.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kopelman PG: Obesity as a medical problem. Nature. 2000, 404 (6778): 635-643.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sieber MH, Thummel CS: The DHR96 nuclear receptor controls triacylglycerol homeostasis in Drosophila. Cell Metab. 2009, 10 (6): 481-490. 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.10.010.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gronke S, Muller G, Hirsch J, Fellert S, Andreou A, Haase T, Jackle H, Kuhnlein RP: Dual lipolytic control of body fat storage and mobilization in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5 (6): e137-10.1371/journal.pbio.0050137.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gutierrez E, Wiggins D, Fielding B, Gould AP: Specialized hepatocyte-like cells regulate Drosophila lipid metabolism. Nature. 2007, 445 (7125): 275-280. 10.1038/nature05382.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sandoval D, Cota D, Seeley RJ: The integrative role of CNS fuel-sensing mechanisms in energy balance and glucose regulation. Annu Rev Physiol. 2008, 70: 513-535. 10.1146/annurev.physiol.70.120806.095256.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strader AD, Woods SC: Gastrointestinal hormones and food intake. Gastroenterology. 2005, 128 (1): 175-191. 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.10.043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Al-Anzi B, Sapin V, Waters C, Zinn K, Wyman RJ, Benzer S: Obesity-blocking neurons in Drosophila. Neuron. 2009, 63 (3): 329-341. 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.07.021.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nassel DR: Neuropeptides in the nervous system of Drosophila and other insects: multiple roles as neuromodulators and neurohormones. Prog Neurobiol. 2002, 68 (1): 1-84. 10.1016/S0301-0082(02)00057-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park D, Veenstra JA, Park JH, Taghert PH: Mapping peptidergic cells in Drosophila: where DIMM fits in. PLoS One. 2008, 3 (3): e1896-10.1371/journal.pone.0001896.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cognigni P, Bailey AP, Miguel-Aliaga I: Enteric neurons and systemic signals couple nutritional and reproductive status with intestinal homeostasis. Cell Metab. 2011, 13 (1): 92-104. 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.12.010.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spiess R, Schoofs A, Heinzel HG: Anatomy of the stomatogastric nervous system associated with the foregut in Drosophila melanogaster and Calliphora vicina third instar larvae. J Morphol. 2008, 269 (3): 272-282. 10.1002/jmor.10581.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sieber MH, Thummel CS: Coordination of triacylglycerol and cholesterol homeostasis by DHR96 and the Drosophila LipA homolog magro. Cell Metab. 2012, 15 (1): 122-127. 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.11.011.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Broughton SJ, Piper MD, Ikeya T, Bass TM, Jacobson J, Driege Y, Martinez P, Hafen E, Withers DJ, Leevers SJ, et al: Longer lifespan, altered metabolism, and stress resistance in Drosophila from ablation of cells making insulin-like ligands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102 (8): 3105-3110. 10.1073/pnas.0405775102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schlegel A, Stainier DY: Lessons from “lower” organisms: what worms, flies, and zebrafish can teach us about human energy metabolism. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3 (11): e199-10.1371/journal.pgen.0030199.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kahsai L, Kapan N, Dircksen H, Winther AM, Nassel DR: Metabolic stress responses in Drosophila are modulated by brain neurosecretory cells that produce multiple neuropeptides. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (7): e11480-10.1371/journal.pone.0011480.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soderberg JA, Carlsson MA, Nassel DR: Insulin-producing cells in the drosophila brain also express satiety-inducing cholecystokinin-like peptide, drosulfakinin. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2012, 3: 109.Google Scholar
- Berthoud HR: The vagus nerve, food intake and obesity. Regul Pept. 2008, 149 (1–3): 15-25.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kirchgessner AL: Orexins in the brain-gut axis. Endocr Rev. 2002, 23 (1): 1-15. 10.1210/er.23.1.1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Srikanth S, Banerjee S, Hasan G: Ectopic expression of a Drosophila InsP(3)R channel mutant has dominant-negative effects in vivo. Cell Calcium. 2006, 39 (2): 187-196. 10.1016/j.ceca.2005.10.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petersen UM, Kadalayil L, Rehorn KP, Hoshizaki DK, Reuter R, Engstrom Y: Serpent regulates Drosophila immunity genes in the larval fat body through an essential GATA motif. EMBO J. 1999, 18 (14): 4013-4022. 10.1093/emboj/18.14.4013.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rulifson EJ, Kim SK, Nusse R: Ablation of insulin-producing neurons in flies: growth and diabetic phenotypes. Science. 2002, 296 (5570): 1118-1120. 10.1126/science.1070058.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lin DM, Goodman CS: Ectopic and increased expression of Fasciclin II alters motoneuron growth cone guidance. Neuron. 1994, 13 (3): 507-523. 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90022-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hewes RS, Park D, Gauthier SA, Schaefer AM, Taghert PH: The bHLH protein Dimmed controls neuroendocrine cell differentiation in Drosophila. Development. 2003, 130 (9): 1771-1781. 10.1242/dev.00404.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lorentzos P, Kaiser T, Kennerson ML, Nicholson GA: A rapid and definitive test for Charcot-Marie-Tooth 1A and hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies using multiplexed real-time PCR. Genet Test. 2003, 7 (2): 135-138. 10.1089/109065703322146821.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.