Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Measurement of propagating waves from local field potentials and unit activity in the cortex of human and monkey

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 1
Contributed equally
BMC Neuroscience201415 (Suppl 1) :P174

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-15-S1-P174

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Primary Visual Cortex
  • Wide Frequency Range
  • Local Field Potential
  • Spatiotemporal Dynamic
  • Middle Temporal Gyrus

The existence of propagating waves, either spontaneous or stimulus-evoked, in neocortex during the awake state has been a subject of recent interest [1, 2]. Here, following work done previously in voltage-sensitive dye imaging of the primary visual cortex in the awake monkey [3], we apply an analysis method for non-parametric, automated detection of propagating waves in noisy multichannel data to multielectrode array (MEA) recordings taken from the neocortex of the human (middle temporal gyrus, as studied in [4]) and monkey (primary visual cortex).

In the spontaneous awake state, we detect transient, intermittent propagations occurring in the local field potential (LFP) across a wide frequency range. After selecting the propagation epochs within the highest confidence interval, we observe that the speed distribution falls naturally into the range of the horizontal fibers (0.1 - 0.5 m/s), suggesting a similar propagation substrate as that observed previously in voltage-sensitive dye imaging data [3]. With this in mind, we go on to compare the spatiotemporal dynamics on the array across various states of arousal.

One question raised by our earlier VSD analysis is the extent to which the wave evoked by a small visual stimulus is supra- or sub-threshold. Specifically, because neurons during awake, "activated" cortical states sit a few millivolts below threshold [5, 6], operating in a fluctuation-driven regime [7], the transient depolarization detected in the VSD signal as the wave passes may change the background spiking probability in the local circuit. To address this, we analyzed the relationship between single- and multi-unit activity (SUA/MUA) and LFP. We study the spatiotemporal dynamics of this relationship to determine the coupling of spiking activity with transient propagating waves, and compare the results with computational models of spiking neurons.

In conclusion, we show here that a combination of multi-electrode recordings, time-series analysis, and computational modeling provides a powerful set of tools for quantifying spatiotemporal dynamics in awake states.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the aid of Sonja Grün (Jülich University), who kindly made available a Blackrock system that was used to collect preliminary results in the primate. Work supported by CNRS, the ANR (Complex-V1) and the EU (BrainScales and the Human Brain Project). LM was supported by a PhD fellowship from the École des Neurosciences de Paris (ENP).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Unité des Neurosciences, Information et Complexité (UNIC), CNRS Gif-sur-Yvette, 91198, France
(2)
Insitut de Neurosciences de la Timone (INT), Marseille, 13005, France

References

  1. Ray S, Maunsell JH: Network rhythms influence the relationship between spike-triggered local field potential and functional connectivity. J Neurosci. 2011, 31: 12674-12682. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1856-11.2011.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Nauhaus I, Busse L, Ringrach DL, Carandini M: Robustness of traveling waves in ongoing activity of visual cortex. J Neurosci. 2012, 32: 3088-3094. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5827-11.2012.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Muller LE, Reynaud A, Chavane F, Destexhe A: Propagating waves structure spatiotemporal activity in visual cortex of the awake monkey. BMC Neurosci. 2013, 14: O8-PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Peyrache A, Dehghani N, Eskandar EN, Madsen JR, Anderson WS, Donoghue JS, Hochberg LR, Halgren E, Cash SS, Destexhe A: Spatiotemporal dynamics of neocortical excitation and inhibition during human sleep. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012, 109: 1731-1736. 10.1073/pnas.1109895109.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Destexhe A, Rudolph M, Paré D: The high-conductance state of neocortical neurons in vivo. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003, 4: 739-751. 10.1038/nrn1198.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Poulet JFA, Petersen CCH: Internal brain state regulates membrane potential synchrony in barrel cortex of behaving mice. Nature. 2008, 454: 881-885. 10.1038/nature07150.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kuhn A, Aertsen A, Rotter S: Neuronal integration of synaptic input in the fluctuation-driven regime. J Neurosci. 2004, 24: 2345-2356. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3349-03.2004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Muller et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement