Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Neural representation of interval timing using electrocorticography

BMC Neuroscience201415 (Suppl 1) :P46

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-15-S1-P46

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Schizophrenia
  • Auditory Cortex
  • Recurrent Neural Network
  • Interval Timing
  • Sensory Cortex

Interval timing refers to the cognitive ability to remember and process the length of time between two events, primarily on the scale of hundreds of milliseconds to tens of seconds [1]. It is critical for a wide range of behaviors, and deficits in interval timing are correlated with several disorders, including schizophrenia, ADHD, and autism [2]. While mechanisms for timing very short and very long periods (milliseconds and hours, respectively) have been extensively studied, the physiological basis for interval timing remains largely unknown [3]. It has often been assumed that specialized brain regions are used for estimating temporal intervals, but currently there is no significant evidence supporting this view. Recent experimental evidence in rodents indicates that the representation of timing might be distributed, and might even exist in primary sensory cortices [4]. For example, Shuler et al. (2006) found timing related neural spiking in V1, and subsequent work has found timing related activity even in cortical slices [5, 6]. Our lab has proposed a model of how such temporal intervals can be represented and learned with recurrent neural networks [7]. These new experimental findings and related models suggest a theoretical framework in which interval timing has a distributed representation throughout the brain, and that this representation is formed via cortical plasticity.

Experimental work examining the mechanism of interval timing has been carried out in animal models, but not in humans. To explore the applicability of the distributed framework to humans, we have designed a set of experiments using electrocorticography (ECOG) in human patients. The patients were instructed to perform a basic interval-timing task, where they learned to respond to two different tones. For the lower frequency tone, patients were trained to press a button 1 second following the sound. For the higher frequency tone, patients were trained to press a button 3 second following the sound. Patients were given a ‘reward’ in the form of points based on how accurately they performed on the task. During the experiment, data was recorded from 50 to 128 subdural electrodes at a rate of 2000 Hz. The data was then filtered and band passed into frequency ranges that have been established to correlate with cognitive activity. Activity in different tone conditions was compared, primarily between the 1 and 3 second time points following the tone. Additionally, the activity immediately prior to reaction was compared to baseline. Preliminary power analysis has shown significant interval timing related activity in and around the auditory cortex. Activation in the anterior temporal lobe and the DLPFC also appear to correspond to timing behavior, suggesting that they may play some physiological role in interval timing. These combined findings support the basic assumptions of the distributed representation framework.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, UTHSC, Houston, TX 77030, USA
(2)
Department of Neurosurgery, UTHSC, Houston, TX 77030, USA

References

  1. Buhusi CV, Meck WH: What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005, 6: 755-765. 10.1038/nrn1764.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Falter CM, Noreika V: Interval timing deficits and abnormal cognitive development. Front Integr Neurosci. 2011, 26-Google Scholar
  3. Mauk MD, Buonomano DV: The neural basis of temporal processing. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004, 27: 307-340. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144247.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Shuler MG, Bear MF: Reward Timing in the Primary Visual Cortex. Science. 2006, 311: 1606-1609. 10.1126/science.1123513.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chubykin AA, Roach EB, Bear MF, Shuler MGH: A cholinergic mechanism for reward timing within primary visual cortex. Neuron. 2013, 77: 723-735. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.039.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Johnson HA, Goel A, Buonomano DV: Neural dynamics of in vitro cortical networks reflects experienced temporal patterns. Nat Neurosci. 2010, 13: 917-919. 10.1038/nn.2579.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gavornik JP, Shuler MGH, Loewenstein Y, Bear MF, Shouval HZ: Learning reward timing in cortex through reward dependent expression of synaptic plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009, 106: 6826-6831. 10.1073/pnas.0901835106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Flynn et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement