Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Partial correlation analysis for functional connectivity studies in cortical networks

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
BMC Neuroscience201415 (Suppl 1) :P99

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-15-S1-P99

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Receiver Operating Characteristic
  • Functional Connectivity
  • Partial Correlation
  • Neural Network Model
  • Neuronal Network

The use of in vitro neuronal systems and computational models has strongly contributed to the better understanding of relevant neurophysiological principles. Taking advantages form these approaches, here we propose a revised method of partial correlation analysis to investigate functional connectivity in neuronal networks.

The main goal of this work is to estimate the functional connectivity, by means of correlation and information theory-based methods, from the spontaneous activity of dissociated cortical neurons developing in vitro and coupled to micro-electrode arrays (MEAs). In particular we focused here on the Partial Correlation (PC) method [1] compared to Transfer Entropy [2] and Cross Correlation (CC) [3] algorithms.

We first evaluated the methods’ performances applying the algorithms to a neural network model made up of 60 spatially distributed and synaptically connected Izhikevich neurons [4]. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calculating the values of the areas under these curves (AUC) and varying the average degree of each cell, we observed that Partial Correlation presented the best performances (see Figure 1) for all the tested average synaptic connectivity degree (from 5 to 55 connections for each neuron).
Figure 1
Figure 1

AUC values: Comparison among the three algorithms (PC, CC and TE).

Second we assessed the statistical significance of connections extracted through the aforementioned algorithms from electrophysiological data. Using “shuffling” techniques devised in [5], we implemented a reliable threshold-independent test, model free and not linked to any particular initial assumptions (i.e., choice of data distribution).

Finally, applying the validated methods, we obtained functional mapping of biological in vitro models of cortical networks and we extracted relevant topological features.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics and Systems Engineering (DIBRIS), University of Genova, Genova, 16145, Italy

References

  1. Eichler M, Dahlhaus R, Sandkuhler J: Partial Corrleation analysis for identification of synaptic connections. Biol. Cybern. 2003, 89: 289-302. 10.1007/s00422-003-0400-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lungarella M, Pitti A, Kuniyoshi Y: Information Transfer at multiple scales. Physical Review E. 2007, 76: 0561171-05611710.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Salinas E, Sejnowski TJ: Correlated neuronal activity and the flow of neural information. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2001, 2: 539-550. 10.1038/35086012.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Izhikevich EM: Simple model of spiking neurons. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. 2003, 6: 1569-1572.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Gruen S, Borgelt C, Gerstein G, Louis S, Diesmann M: Selecting appropriate surrogate methods for spike correlation analysis. From nineteenth annual computational neuroscience meeting CNS. 2010Google Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement