Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Detrimental effects of tropisetron on permanent ischemic stroke in the rat

  • 1, 2Email author,
  • 3 and
  • 1, 4
BMC Neuroscience20089:19

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-19

  • Received: 12 October 2007
  • Accepted: 06 February 2008
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Recent in vitro evidence indicates that blockade of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor 3 (5-HT3) is able to confer protection in different models of neuronal injury. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of tropisetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, on infarct size and neurological score in a model of ischemic stroke induced by permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (pMCAO) in the rat.

Methods

Two different doses of tropisetron (5 and 10 mg/kg) or vehicle were administered intraperitoneally 30 min before pMCAO. Neurological deficit scores, mortality rate and infarct volume were determined 24 h after permanent focal cerebral ischemia.

Results

Tropisetron failed to reduce cerebral infarction. Animals receiving tropisetron showed a significant increase (p < 0.05) in neurological deficits and mortality rate.

Conclusion

Data from this study indicate that blockade of 5-HT3 receptors with tropisetron worsens ischemic brain injury induced by pMCAO. These findings could have important clinical implications. Patients taking tropisetron, and possibly other 5-HT3 antagonists, could potentially have a worse outcome following a brain infarct.

Keywords

  • Infarct Volume
  • Brain Infarct
  • Gaba Release
  • Tropisetron
  • Neurological Deficit Score

Background

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide [1, 2]. Although significant efforts have been devoted to understand the pathophysiology of cerebral ischemia, very few therapeutic options are available [3]. Among the deleterious events following occlusion of a blood vessel in the brain, excitotoxicity and alteration of intraneuronal Ca2+ homeostasis are considered early processes that propagate the cascade of harmful events leading to cerebral infarction [4, 5]. The primary ischemic episode results in neuroinflammation, which leads to increase in tissue destruction through mechanisms involving oxidative stress, upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β), enhanced metabolism of arachidonic acid, breakdown of the blood-brain barrier, and edema [68].

Recently, there has been much interest in the potential neuroprotective efficacy of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor subtype 3 (5-HT3) antagonists [9, 10]. Blockade of 5-HT3 receptor with MDL72222 and Y-25130 reduced glutamate release, elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ concentration, oxidative damage, and apoptotic neuronal cell death induced by either hydrogen peroxide or β-amyloid peptide [9, 10]. Furthermore, an earlier study by Kagami-ishi and colleagues demonstrated that the 5-HT3 antagonist Y-25130 conferred protection against ischemia-induced decrease in CA1 field potential in rat hippocampal slices [11].

In the light of all this previous evidence, the present investigation was conducted to assess whether treatment with the 5-HT3 antagonist tropisetron would show neuroprotective effect against cerebral ischemic injury. Since most cases of human ischemic stroke are caused by irreversible occlusion of major cerebral arteries [1214], we utilized a well-standardized model of permanent occlusion of the middle cerebral artery (pMCAO) in the rat.

Results

Effect of tropisetron on infarct volume following permanent focal cerebral ischemia in the rat

Using the intraluminal filament technique, we had previously found that infarct size reached its maximal values at 24 h after pMCAO [15]. For this reason, in the present investigation animals were studied at 24 h after the onset of stroke. All animals studied had large infarct areas in the MCA territory, involving both cortical and subcortical structures, as revealed by the lack of TTC staining in these regions (Fig. 1A). Pretreatment with two different doses of the 5-HT3 antagonist, tropisetron, failed to reduce the total infarct volume, as shown in Fig. 1B. To exclude the possibility of a region-specific outcome, we next investigated the effect of tropisetron on the infarct volume in cortical and subcortical regions. Again, tropisetron did not significantly modify the size of the infarct in this animal model of stroke (Fig. 1B). Similarly, we studied the rostrocaudal distribution of areas of cortical and subcortical infarction at six coronal levels in tropisetron- and vehicle-treated rats. No effect of tropisetron was observed at any level of the brain infarct (data not shown). Furthermore, among treatment groups, there were no statistically significant differences in the edema index (Vehicle: 1.033 ± 0.028; Tropisetron 5 mg/kg: 1.031 ± 0.013; and Tropisetron 10 mg/kg: 1.039 ± 0.018).
Figure 1
Figure 1

(A): Representative TTC-stained sections of vehicle- and tropisetron-treated rats at 24 h following permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (pMCAO). Tropisetron or vehicle was given intraperitoneally 30 min before pMCAO. (B): Total, cortical and subcortical infarct volumes assessed at 24 h in control (vehicle) and tropisetron groups. No significant effect of tropisetron on cerebral infarction was found.

Ischemic animals receiving tropisetron showed increased neurological deficits and mortality

Animals given tropisetron displayed a significant increase in the neurological deficits at 24 h after pMCAO. Although administration of 5 mg/kg of tropisetron did not significantly modify neurological scores, treatment of rats with 10 mg/kg of tropisetron 30 min before pMCAO produced a significant deterioration of the neurological status in these animals (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, in animals receiving the highest dose of tropisetron, there was a significant (p = 0.0089; Χ2 test) increase to 55.5% (5 of 9 rats) in the mortality rate compared to vehicle-treated animals (8.3%; 1 of 12 rats), as shown in Fig. 2B. There was a trend towards an increase in mortality in rats receiving 5 mg/kg of tropisetron, but this effect did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.0518; Χ2 test).
Figure 2
Figure 2

Effect of the 5-HT 3 antagonist tropisetron on neurological deficits scores (A) and mortality rate (B) after pMCAO. Animals received a single i.p. injection of tropisetron or the vehicle 30 min before being subjected to pMCAO. Twenty-four hours later, neurological scores were evaluated following a 6-point scale as detailed in Materials and Methods. Median neurological score is marked in Panel A by a small horizontal bar. Mortality rate is presented as percentage (%). *p < 0.05 with respect to vehicle-treated animals.

Discussion

Present data do not support the notion that blockade of 5-HT3 receptors reduces ischemic brain injury induced by focal cerebral ischemia. On the contrary, our findings clearly showed that treatment with tropisetron worsened neurological recovery and increased mortality of ischemic animals. No previous investigations have been published on the effects of the 5-HT3 antagonist tropisetron on neuronal damage induced by focal cerebral ischemia. Thus, these in vivo data could have important implications for the potential use of 5-HT3 antagonists in neuroprotection, as other investigators have suggested [911]. Most 'negative' results in preclinical studies in cerebral ischemia are not even submitted for publication. This practice goes against the STAIR (Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable) recommendations that data, both positive and negative, should be published [1618].

Previous studies evaluating the neuroprotective efficacy of 5-HT3 antagonists utilized in vitro cultures of neurons and hippocampal slices subjected to ischemia-like conditions. Those findings indicated that blockade of 5-HT3 receptors might confer significant neuroprotection by reducing glutamate release, free radicals formation, and maintenance of Ca2+ homeostasis [9, 10].

It is well established that the activation of 5-HT3 receptors is followed by rapid depolarization causing rapid rise in cytosolic Ca2+ levels by inducing influx of Ca2+ and mobilization of intracellular Ca2+ stores [19]. These processes modulate the release of various neurotransmitters including dopamine, glutamate, acetylcholine, GABA and 5-HT itself [19, 20].

We had previously shown that tropisetron potently inhibits lipopolysaccharide-mediated production of TNF-α and IL-1β in human monocytes, as well as 5-HT-induced prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) release from synovial cells [21, 22]. In addition, we found that tropisetron inhibited DNA binding and transcriptional activity of NFAT, AP-1 and NF-κB in T cells exposed to pro-inflammatory stimuli [23]. Furthermore, very recent data from our lab indicate that the 5-HT3 antagonists, tropisetron, ondansetron and dolansetron, significantly reduce PGE2 release and 8-isoprostane formation (a reliable marker of free radical generation) in neuronal cells exposed to IL-1β (Fiebich et al., manuscript in preparation).

Based on this promising evidence coming from in vitro studies, one might expect that blockade of 5-HT3 receptors to be beneficial in cerebral ischemia. However, results from this investigation not only demonstrate that treatment with tropisetron failed to diminish brain infarction, but also showed that neurological deficits and mortality rate were dramatically increased in ischemic animals given this 5-HT3 antagonist. At present, the molecular mechanisms underlying these detrimental effects of tropisetron are far from clear. In addition, it is not yet known whether other 5-HT3 antagonists share these stroke-worsening properties of tropisetron.

One possible explanation for these detrimental effects of tropisetron might be the ability of 5-HT3 antagonists to significantly reduce GABAergic neurotransmission [24, 25]. This notion is based on evidence showing that Ca2+ influx through presynaptic 5-HT3 receptors facilitates GABA release in several brain regions [25, 26]. Cerebral ischemia produces a dramatic increase in GABA release, which is thought to be an important compensatory mechanism against ischemia [27]. Activation of GABA receptors potently reduces ischemic and excitotoxic brain injury [27]. Thus, blockade of 5-HT3 receptors with tropisetron could potentially hamper this protective mechanism involving ischemia-mediated GABA release. However, this possibility should be confirmed experimentally in a model of ischemic stroke.

Antagonists of 5-HT3 receptors, including tropisetron, are clinically used for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis. These drugs selectively and competitively bind to 5-HT3 receptors, blocking serotonin binding at vagal afferents in the gut and in the regions of the central nervous system involved in emesis, including the chemoreceptor trigger zone and the nucleus tractus solitarii [28, 29].

It is difficult to ascertain whether the doses of tropisetron used here in the rat are comparable to the dosage used in humans. A direct interspecies dose extrapolation is usually inaccurate due to changes in the pharmacokinetic/pharmacological behavior of the drug in different species [30]. This is further complicated by the fact that some 5-HT3 antagonists, including tropisetron, show a bell-shaped dose-response curve [20], leaving open the possibility that lower doses of tropisetron might have complete different effects in permanent ischemic stroke.

Significant increase in neurological deficits and mortality was found in animals receiving tropisetron. However, no parallel increase in infarct size was observed in any of the groups treated with tropisetron when compared to rats given the vehicle. There is not always a direct correlation between the lesion size and the severity of neurological deficits as demonstrated before in animal models [31, 32] and in stroke patients [33]. This indicates that the severity of disability is not predicted well by the amount of brain tissue lost.

Conclusion

In summary, this study showed that the 5-HT3 antagonist tropisetron failed to reduce cerebral infarction induced by pMCAO in the rat, and produced a significant increase in neurological deficits and mortality rate. Whichever the mechanism(s) responsible for the detrimental effects of tropisetron in cerebral ischemia, present study could have important clinical implications. Patients taking tropisetron, and possibly other 5-HT3 antagonists, might have a worse prognosis following a cerebral ischemic event.

Methods

Animals

Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 280–320 g at the time of surgery were obtained from Harlan Spain (Harlan Interfauna Iberica S.A., Barcelona, Spain). Our institutional animal care and use committee approved the experimental protocol. The animals were quarantined for at least 7 days before the experiment. Animals were housed in groups in a room whose environment was maintained at 21–25°C, 45–50% humidity, and 12-h light/dark cycle. They had free access to pellet chow and water. Animal housing, care, and application of experimental procedures were in accordance with institutional guidelines under approved protocols.

Induction of permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (pMCAO) in the rat

Rats were anesthetized with chloral hydrate (300 mg/kg body weight, i.p.). Once surgical levels of anesthesia were attained (assessed by absence of hind leg withdrawal to pinch), ischemia was induced by using an occluding intraluminal suture as described previously [31, 34, 35]. Briefly, the right common carotid artery (CCA) was exposed by a ventral midline neck incision and ligated with a 3-0 silk suture. The pterygopalatine branch of the internal carotid artery was clipped to prevent incorrect insertion of the occluder filament. Arteriotomy was performed in the CCA approximately 3 mm proximal to the bifurcation and a silicone rubber coated 4-0 nylon filament (Doccol Corporation, Redlands, CA, USA) was introduced into the internal carotid artery (ICA) until a mild resistance was felt (18–19 mm). Mild resistance to this advancement indicated that the intraluminal occluder had entered the anterior cerebral artery and occluded the origin of the anterior cerebral artery, the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and posterior communicating arteries [36]. After the advancement of the nylon suture, the ICA was firmly ligated with a 3-0 silk suture. The incision was closed and the occluding suture was left in place until sacrificing the animals. The duration of surgery did not exceed 12 min in any case. The animals were allowed to recover from anesthesia and to eat and drink freely. The body temperature was strictly controlled during and after ischemia using an overhead lamp and a heating blanket. No significant effect of tropisetron on body temperature was observed (data not shown). To allow for better postoperative recovery, we chose not to monitor physiological parameters in the present study because additional surgical procedures are needed for this monitoring.

Evaluation of neurological deficits

After 24 h of pMCAO, an unaware independent observer performed the neurological evaluations prior to the sacrifice of the animals according to a six-point scale: 0 = no neurological deficits, 1 = failure to extend left forepaw fully, 2 = circling to the left, 3 = falling to left, 4 = no spontaneous walking with a depressed level of consciousness, 5 = death [36, 37].

Quantification of brain infarct volume

The size of the brain infarct was assessed at 24 h following pMCAO. The method for quantification of infarct volume was performed exactly as described in these reports [15, 35, 38, 39]. Briefly, the animals were sacrificed under deep anesthesia and brains were removed, frozen, and coronally sectioned into six 2-mm-thick slices (from rostral to caudal, first to sixth) using a rat brain matrix (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL, USA). The brain slices were incubated for 30 min in a 2% solution of 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) (Sigma Chemical Co., Saint Louis, MO, USA) at 37°C and fixed by immersion in a 10% phosphate-buffered formalin solution. Six TTC-stained brain sections per animal were placed directly on the scanning screen of a color flatbed scanner (Hewlett Packard HP Scanjet 5370 C) within 7 days. Following image acquisition, the images were analyzed blindly using a commercial image processing software program (Photoshop, version 7.0, Adobe Systems; Mountain View, CA, USA). Measurements were made by manually outlining the margins of infarcted areas. The unstained area of the fixed brain section was defined as infarcted. Cortical and subcortical uncorrected infarcted areas and total hemispheric areas were calculated separately for each coronal slice. Total cortical and subcortical uncorrected infarct volumes were calculated by multiplying the infarcted area by the slice thickness and summing the volume of the six slices. A corrected infarct volume was calculated to compensate for the effect of brain edema. An edema index was calculated by dividing the total volume of the hemisphere ipsilateral to pMCAO by the total volume of the contralateral hemisphere. The actual infarct volume adjusted for edema was calculated by dividing the infarct volume by the edema index [40, 41]. Infarct volumes are expressed as a percentage of the contralateral (control) hemisphere. The investigator who performed the image analysis was blinded to the study groups.

Drug treatment

Animals were randomly allotted in three different groups: tropisetron 5 mg/kg (n = 11), tropisetron 10 mg/kg (n = 9) and vehicle (physiological saline, n = 12). Drugs were given intraperitoneally 30 min before inducing pMCAO. These doses were selected based on previous studies demonstrating effects of tropisetron in the central nervous system [42, 43]. In addition, the pharmacokinetic profile of these doses of tropisetron has being well-characterized in the rat [44]. Tropisetron was obtained from the in-house pharmacy of the University of Freiburg Medical School (Freiburg, Germany).

Data analysis

Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. Values were compared using t-test (two groups) or one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Student-Newman-Keuls test (multiple comparison). Neurological deficit scores were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric ANOVA followed by the Dunn test (multiple comparison) or Mann-Whitney test for analysis of individual differences. Mortality rate was analyzed using Chi-square (Χ2) test. Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.

List of abbreviations

ANOVA: 

analysis of variance

5-HT: 

5-hydroxytryptamine

pMCAO: 

permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion

TTC: 

2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Eduardo Candelario-Jalil was supported by a research fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Bonn, Germany).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Neurochemistry Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Freiburg Medical School, Hauptstr. 5, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
(2)
Department of Neurology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
(3)
Departamento de Biología Celular, Fisiología e Inmunología. Universidad de Córdoba, Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
(4)
VivaCell Biotechnology GmbH, Ferdinand-Porsche-Str. 5, D-79211 Denzlingen, Germany

References

  1. Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Anderson CS: Stroke epidemiology: a review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in the late 20th century. Lancet Neurol. 2003, 2: 43-53. 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00266-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Truelsen T, Piechowski-Jozwiak B, Bonita R, Mathers C, Bogousslavsky J, Boysen G: Stroke incidence and prevalence in Europe: a review of available data. Eur J Neurol. 2006, 13: 581-598. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01138.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Sacco RL, Chong JY, Prabhakaran S, Elkind MS: Experimental treatments for acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet. 2007, 369: 331-341. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60155-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mitsios N, Gaffney J, Kumar P, Krupinski J, Kumar S, Slevin M: Pathophysiology of acute ischaemic stroke: an analysis of common signalling mechanisms and identification of new molecular targets. Pathobiology. 2006, 73: 159-175. 10.1159/000096017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hazell AS: Excitotoxic mechanisms in stroke: An update of concepts and treatment strategies. Neurochem Int. 2007, 50: 941-953. 10.1016/j.neuint.2007.04.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Muralikrishna AR, Hatcher JF: Phospholipase A2, reactive oxygen species, and lipid peroxidation in cerebral ischemia. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006, 40: 376-387. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.08.044.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. del Zoppo G, Ginis I, Hallenbeck JM, Iadecola C, Wang X, Feuerstein GZ: Inflammation and stroke: putative role for cytokines, adhesion molecules and iNOS in brain response to ischemia. Brain Pathol. 2000, 10: 95-112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dirnagl U, Iadecola C, Moskowitz MA: Pathobiology of ischaemic stroke: an integrated view. Trends Neurosci. 1999, 22: 391-397. 10.1016/S0166-2236(99)01401-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee HJ, Ban JY, Seong YH: Blockade of 5-HT(3) receptor with MDL7222 and Y25130 reduces hydrogen peroxide-induced neurotoxicity in cultured rat cortical cells. Life Sci. 2005, 78: 294-300. 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.04.043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ban JY, Seong YH: Blockade of 5-HT(3) receptor with MDL 72222 and Y 25130 reduces beta-amyloid protein (25--35)-induced neurotoxicity in cultured rat cortical neurons. Eur J Pharmacol. 2005, 520: 12-21. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.07.021.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kagami-ishi Y, Shigenobu S, Watanabe S: Neuroprotective effect of 5-HT3 receptor antagonist on ischemia-induced decrease in CA1 field potential in rat hippocampal slices. Eur J Pharmacol. 1992, 224: 51-56. 10.1016/0014-2999(92)94817-F.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Hacke W, Schwab S, Horn M, Spranger M, De GM, von KR: 'Malignant' middle cerebral artery territory infarction: clinical course and prognostic signs. Arch Neurol. 1996, 53: 309-315.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kassem-Moussa H, Graffagnino C: Nonocclusion and spontaneous recanalization rates in acute ischemic stroke: a review of cerebral angiography studies. Arch Neurol. 2002, 59: 1870-1873. 10.1001/archneur.59.12.1870.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pantano P, Caramia F, Bozzao L, Dieler C, von KR: Delayed increase in infarct volume after cerebral ischemia: correlations with thrombolytic treatment and clinical outcome. Stroke. 1999, 30: 502-507.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Candelario-Jalil E, Mhadu NH, Gonzalez-Falcon A, Garcia-Cabrera M, Munoz E, Leon OS, Fiebich BL: Effects of the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor nimesulide on cerebral infarction and neurological deficits induced by permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. J Neuroinflammation. 2005, 2: 3-10.1186/1742-2094-2-3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dirnagl U: Bench to bedside: the quest for quality in experimental stroke research. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006, 26: 1465-1478. 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600298.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisher M: Recommendations for advancing development of acute stroke therapies: Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable 3. Stroke. 2003, 34: 1539-1546. 10.1161/01.STR.0000072983.64326.53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Savitz SI, Fisher M: Future of neuroprotection for acute stroke: in the aftermath of the SAINT trials. Ann Neurol. 2007, 61: 396-402. 10.1002/ana.21127.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Barnes NM, Sharp T: A review of central 5-HT receptors and their function. Neuropharmacology. 1999, 38: 1083-1152. 10.1016/S0028-3908(99)00010-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Faerber L, Drechsler S, Ladenburger S, Gschaidmeier H, Fischer W: The neuronal 5-HT3 receptor network after 20 years of research--evolving concepts in management of pain and inflammation. Eur J Pharmacol. 2007, 560: 1-8. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.01.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Fiebich BL, Akundi RS, Lieb K, Candelario-Jalil E, Gmeiner D, Haus U, Muller W, Stratz T, Munoz E: Antiinflammatory effects of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated primary human monocytes. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 2004, 28-32. 10.1080/03009740410006998.Google Scholar
  22. Seide MF, Ulrich-Merzenich G, Fiebich B, Candelario-Jalil E, Koch FW, Vetter H: Tropisetron inhibits serotonin-induced PGE2 release from macrophage-like synovial cells in serum-free tissue culture. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 2004, 33-10.1080/03009740410007005.Google Scholar
  23. de la Vega L, Munoz E, Calzado MA, Lieb K, Candelario-Jalil E, Gschaidmeir H, Farber L, Mueller W, Stratz T, Fiebich BL: The 5-HT3 receptor antagonist tropisetron inhibits T cell activation by targeting the calcineurin pathway. Biochem Pharmacol. 2005, 70: 369-380. 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.04.031.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Meyer DK, Holland A, Lais A, Szabo B: Effects of p-chloroamphetamine on release of [3H]gamma-aminobutyric acid from slices of rat caudate-putamen. Eur J Pharmacol. 1991, 196: 189-195. 10.1016/0014-2999(91)90427-R.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Turner TJ, Mokler DJ, Luebke JI: Calcium influx through presynaptic 5-HT3 receptors facilitates GABA release in the hippocampus: in vitro slice and synaptosome studies. Neuroscience. 2004, 129: 703-718. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.08.020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Koyama S, Matsumoto N, Kubo C, Akaike N: Presynaptic 5-HT3 receptor-mediated modulation of synaptic GABA release in the mechanically dissociated rat amygdala neurons. J Physiol. 2000, 529 Pt 2: 373-383. 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00373.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Saransaari P, Oja SS: Characteristics of GABA release in mouse brain stem slices under normal and ischemic conditions. Neurochem Res. 2005, 30: 1549-1556. 10.1007/s11064-005-8833-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gan TJ: Selective serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for postoperative nausea and vomiting: are they all the same?. CNS Drugs. 2005, 19: 225-238. 10.2165/00023210-200519030-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ho KY, Gan TJ: Pharmacology, pharmacogenetics, and clinical efficacy of 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonists for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006, 19: 606-611. 10.1097/01.aco.0000247340.61815.38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mahmood I, Green MD, Fisher JE: Selection of the first-time dose in humans: comparison of different approaches based on interspecies scaling of clearance. J Clin Pharmacol. 2003, 43: 692-697.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gonzalez-Falcon A, Candelario-Jalil E, Garcia-Cabrera M, Leon OS: Effects of pyruvate administration on infarct volume and neurological deficits following permanent focal cerebral ischemia in rats. Brain Res. 2003, 990: 1-7. 10.1016/S0006-8993(03)03378-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hunter AJ, Mackay KB, Rogers DC: To what extent have functional studies of ischaemia in animals been useful in the assessment of potential neuroprotective agents?. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1998, 19: 59-66. 10.1016/S0165-6147(97)01157-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Roundtable STAIRII: Recommendations for clinical trial evaluation of acute stroke therapies. Stroke. 2001, 32: 1598-1606.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Doerfler A, Schwab S, Hoffmann TT, Engelhorn T, Forsting M: Combination of decompressive craniectomy and mild hypothermia ameliorates infarction volume after permanent focal ischemia in rats. Stroke. 2001, 32: 2675-2681. 10.1161/hs1101.098369.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Candelario-Jalil E, Gonzalez-Falcon A, Garcia-Cabrera M, Leon OS, Fiebich BL: Post-ischaemic treatment with the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor nimesulide reduces blood-brain barrier disruption and leukocyte infiltration following transient focal cerebral ischaemia in rats. J Neurochem. 2007, 100: 1108-1120. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04280.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Longa EZ, Weinstein PR, Carlson S, Cummins R: Reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion without craniectomy in rats. Stroke. 1989, 20: 84-91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Minematsu K, Li L, Sotak CH, Davis MA, Fisher M: Reversible focal ischemic injury demonstrated by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in rats. Stroke. 1992, 23: 1304-1310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Yang Y, Shuaib A, Li Q: Quantification of infarct size on focal cerebral ischemia model of rats using a simple and economical method. J Neurosci Methods. 1998, 84: 9-16. 10.1016/S0165-0270(98)00067-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Shabanzadeh AP, Shuaib A, Wang CX: Simvastatin reduced ischemic brain injury and perfusion deficits in an embolic model of stroke. Brain Res. 2005, 1042: 1-5. 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.01.105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Reglodi D, Somogyvari-Vigh A, Vigh S, Kozicz T, Arimura A: Delayed systemic administration of PACAP38 is neuroprotective in transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat. Stroke. 2000, 31: 1411-1417.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Candelario-Jalil E, Gonzalez-Falcon A, Garcia-Cabrera M, Leon OS, Fiebich BL: Wide therapeutic time window for nimesulide neuroprotection in a model of transient focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. Brain Res. 2004, 1007: 98-108. 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.01.078.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Mhatre M, Pruthi R, Hensley K, Holloway F: 5-HT3 antagonist ICS 205-930 enhances naltrexone's effects on ethanol intake. Eur J Pharmacol. 2004, 491: 149-156. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.03.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. King GR, Pinto G, Konen J, Castro G, Tran S, Hilburn C: The effects of continuous 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist administration on the subsequent behavioral response to cocaine. Eur J Pharmacol. 2002, 449: 253-259. 10.1016/S0014-2999(02)02036-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Huang CT, Chen CF, Tsai TH: Measurement and pharmacokinetic study of unbound tropisetron in rat blood by microdialysis with high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Pharm. 1999, 182: 237-242. 10.1016/S0378-5173(99)00079-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement