Skip to main content

Table 2 Individual hold-out error rates (average %) and computational demands

From: Multivariate assessment of event-related potentials with the t-CWT method

\({\mathbf {S}}_{{\mathbf {c}}}\) (ms)

\({{\mathbf {f}}}_{{\mathbf {c}}}\) (Hz)

R (pps)

PCA

Average holdout error rates (%)

Freq.

Log

Matrix

ME ratio:

Processing time

   

\({{\mathbf {P}}}_{{\mathbf {v}}}\) (%)

A priori: 50 %

A priori: 13.6 %

Dom.

Grid

Elements

\(\underline{{\mathbf {N}}_{{\mathbf {F}}} {\mathbf {N}}_{{\mathbf {G}}} {\mathbf {S}}_{{\mathbf {c}}}^{{\mathbf {2}}}}\)

Total (h:min)

Per ME (ns)

    

Std

Dev

Tot

Std

Dev

Tot

\({\mathbf {N}}_{{\mathbf {F}}}\)

\({\mathbf {N}}_{{\mathbf {G}}}\)

\({\mathbf {K}} {\mathbf {N}}_{{\mathbf {F}}}\) \({\mathbf {N}}_{{\mathbf {G}}}\)

\({\mathbf {R}}^{{\mathbf {2}}}\) \({\mathbf {T}}^{{\mathbf {2}}}\)

  

250

4

10

95

22.0

31.7

23.3

2.2

66.8

11.0

9

774

62,694

12.1

0:07

858

100

10

15

95

19.0

32.8

20.9

2.7

61.9

10.7

25

4,339

976,275

13.4

0:57

467

100

10

15

97

18.2

32.2

20.1

2.9

60.6

10.8

25

4,339

976,275

13.4

0:58

474

100

10

15

99

16.9

32.0

18.9

2.8

57.6

10.2

25

4,339

976,275

13.4

0:59

476

50

20

15

95

18.7

32.9

20.7

2.9

61.3

10.8

49

8,320

3,669,120

12.6

3:02

394

50

20

15

97

17.5

33.2

19.7

2.8

58.3

10.3

49

8,320

3,669,120

12.6

3:04

398

50

20

15

99

15.4

33.7

17.9

2.9

55.5

10.0

49

8,320

3,669,120

12.6

3:10

412

40

25

15

95

17.8

32.7

19.8

2.7

61.4

10.6

61

10,341

5,677,209

12.5

4:41

393

40

25

15

97

16.9

32.6

19.0

2.8

58.8

10.4

61

10,341

5,677,209

12.5

4:37

388

40

25

15

99

15.3

33.2

17.7

3.0

55.0

10.0

61

10,341

5,677,209

12.5

4:44

397

40

25

20

99

15.4

31.8

17.6

3.0

55.2

10.1

61

18,257

10,023,093

12.4

8:19

395

40

25

25

99

15.0

32.7

17.4

2.7

55.7

9.9

61

28,245

15,506,505

12.3

13:41

420

30

33

15

99

15.5

34.5

18.1

3.3

56.5

10.5

81

13,657

9,955,953

12.3

7:46

372