Skip to main content

Table 1 Difference between verum and sham stimulation in amplitude, latency and a combined z-Score

From: Occipital repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not affect multifocal visual evoked potentials

 

Change in amplitude (nV)

Change in latency (ms)

Change in Z-score

Verum

Sham

p-value

Verum

Sham

p-value

Verum

Sham

p-value

Full field

− 2.54

+ 4.63

0.155

 + 0.01

 + 0.60

0.538

− 0.079

 + 0.063

0.528

Central

− 2.92

 + 8.47

0.094

 + 1.49

− 1.84

0.010

− 0.282

 + 0.496

0.006

Peripheral 1

− 2.49

 + 7.01

0.158

 + 0.50

− 0.47

0.298

− 0.140

 + 0.275

0.121

Peripheral 2

− 3.63

 + 4.24

0.181

− 0.24

 + 1.40

0.410

− 0.079

− 0.053

0.941

Peripheral 3

− 2.00

 + 3.20

0.208

 + 0.15

 + 2.83

0.148

− 0.081

− 0.269

0.527

Peripheral 4

− 1.80

 + 1.51

0.379

− 1.33

 + 0.26

0.443

 + 0.118

 + 0.013

0.744