Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | BMC Neuroscience

Fig. 2

From: Different paradigms of transcranial electrical stimulation improve motor function impairment and striatum tissue injuries in the collagenase-induced intracerebral hemorrhage rat model

Fig. 2

The tES effect on locomotor deficits evaluated by wire hanging test (falling latency). Data are indicated as mean ± SEM (n = 8). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001 vs. the sham group and # P < 0.05, ### P < 0.001, #### P < 0.0001 vs. the ICH group and & P < 0.05 vs. the TDCS group. There was no significant difference between the control and sham groups. ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; TACS; transcranial alternating current stimulation; TDCS, transcranial direct current stimulation; tES, transcranial electrical stimulation; TPCS, transcranial pulsed current stimulation; TRNS, transcranial random noise stimulation

Back to article page