BMC Neuroscience

Table 8 Group comparisons for three time epochs of the LAN in the syntactic condition

From: The influence of language deprivation in early childhood on L2 processing: An ERP comparison of deaf native signers and deaf signers with a delayed language acquisition

Group comparisons LAN		Time epoch
groups	effects	300–366 ms		367–432 ms		433–500 msv		66 ms each
		F	p	F	p	F	p	F	p
EGL/LSL	GR,CO	0.282	0.602	0.168	0.687	0.023	0.881	0.120	0.732
	GR,CO,HE	1.420	0.249	7.835	0.012	5.235	0.034	21.322	< 0.001
	GR,CO,CL	0.273	0.732	1.023	0.376	1.035	0.375	0.273	0.808
	GR,CO,HE,CL	1.454	0.244	2.281	0.100	2.111	0.119	5.296	0.003
		F	p	F	p	F	p	F	p
EGL/ESL	GR,CO	0.330	0.573	0.107	0.748	1.215	0.285	0.740	0.401
	GR,CO,HE	0.743	0.400	9.504	0.006	0.581	0.456	5.671	0.028
	GR,CO,CL	0.990	0.372	0.690	0.531	0.627	0.550	1.934	0.155
	GR,CO,HE,CL	0.725	0.487	1.370	0.266	0.204	0.825	0.619	0.551
		F	p	F	p	F	p	F	p
LSL/ESL	GR,CO	0.001	0.975	0.379	0.548	0.693	0.419	1.290	0.275
	GR,CO,HE	2.125	0.167	0.162	0.693	3.601	0.079	8.493	0.011
	GR,CO,CL	0.765	0.465	0.188	0.855	0.309	0.756	2.283	0.115
	GR,CO,HE,CL	2.362	0.097	0.551	0.630	1.405	0.261	3.987	0.017

GR: Group, CO: Condition, HE: Hemisphere, CL: Cluster; p < 0.05; p < 0.01; p < 0.001; EGL: hearing early German language learners, ESL: deaf early sign language learners, LSL: deaf late sign language learners.

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2202

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com