Skip to main content

Table 3 Planned pair-wise comparisons at the pronoun.

From: Differences in the processing of anaphoric reference between closely related languages: neurophysiological evidence

Early negativity (150–280 ms)

Pz

N/S-B?

N/S-B-

D/S-B+

D/S+B?

D/S-B-

N/S+B+

3.40**

0.72

1.60

2.12*

0.34

N/S-B?

 

3.60**

4.90**

0.73

3.57**

N/S-B-

  

0.62

2.20*

1.13

D/S-B+

   

2.47*

1.69

D/S+B?

    

1.55

N400 (280–400 ms)

Pz

N/S-B?

N/S-B-

D/S-B+

D/S+B?

D/S-B-

N/S+B+

3.14**

0.72

2.11*

2.11*

-0.34

N/S-B?

 

3.77**

4.26**

0.73

3.57**

N/S-B-

  

0.43

2.20*

1.13

D/S-B+

   

2.86**

1.42

D/S+B?

    

1.58

P600 (500–800 ms)

Pz

N/S-B?

N/S-B-

D/S-B+

D/S+B?

D/S-B-

N/S+B+

0.53

4.19**

2.18*

1.18

2.79**

N/S-B?

 

3.73**

0.86

0.41

2.56*

N/S-B-

  

1.92*

3.42**

0.82

D/S-B+

   

0.80

1.13

D/S+B?

    

2.25*

  1. Overview of the T – values of planned pair-wise comparisons between six conditions of the data at the pronoun for three different time-windows (T-values marked with * are significant at the 5% level, and with ** on the 1% level).
Back to article page

BMC Neuroscience

ISSN: 1471-2202

Contact us