- Poster presentation
- Open Access
Active dendritic conductances enhance processing of plastic synaptic stimuli
© Volman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Published: 11 July 2008
The problem of gain control in a neuron that faces thousands of synaptic stimuli has received much attention. Studies of relatively simple models established that synaptic gain can be modulated by multiple factors, such as pre-synaptic plasticity and/or intrinsic neuronal nonlinearities [1, 2]. However, most central synapses are characterized by small active zones and high stochasticity of vesicular release . In addition, dendritic trees abound with active conductances . All of the above calls for a revised look at the simplified mean-field models of gain modulation.
Using multi-compartmental modeling techniques and a biophysically realistic model of plastic stochastic CA3-CA1 synapses, we investigated here the properties of dendritic signal processing in the quantal limit of synaptic transmission. We found that, notwithstanding the relatively large number of afferent synapses, the spike trains of a model neuron are marked by quite high variability. These studies underscore the role of active dendritic conductances, and in particular of slow Ca-associated mechanisms, in the processing of plastic synaptic stimuli.
It is well-known that the mechanism of somatic spike generation in cortical neurons is very reliable. Therefore, we anticipated that the variability of output spike trains resides in sub-threshold voltage fluctuations that, in turn, reflect dendritic processing of synaptic stimuli. Indeed, making pre-synaptic short-term depression milder (by reducing the vesicle turnover time) resulted in the consistent reduction of voltage fluctuations (as captured by standard deviation), thus leading to more regular spike trains. These results corroborate previous findings on the important role of pre-synaptic depression in the control of synaptic gain .
In our model, the extent of spike train variability could be modulated by changing the ionic channel composition of the dendritic tree. Removal of slow mechanisms associated with calcium and calcium-activated channels led to a significant decrease of sub-threshold voltage fluctuations and to less variable output spike trains. Furthermore, a complete removal of active properties resulted in an almost regular spike train.
Distributing the synapses along the dendritic tree significantly improved the ability of a model CA1 pyramidal neuron to detect fluctuating trends in synaptic activity. The spike train of a point-like conductance-based model neuron was characterized by very low variability. By contrast, when synaptic inputs were distributed along the dendritic tree, the firing rate rose gradually for progressively increasing synaptic strength, and the typical spike train was very variable.
In summary, our studies suggest that hippocampal pyramidal cells might be equipped with mechanisms that allow them to "sense" activity-dependent trends in afferent firing. Thus, it provides a testable hypothesis as regards contextual modulation of hippocampal place cell firing.
This research has been supported by NSF-sponsored Center for Theoretical Biological Physics (grant numbers PHY-0216576 and PHY-0225630). Vladislav Volman has been supported by ICAM travel award.
- Abbott LF, Varela JA, Sen K, Nelson SB: Synaptic depression and cortical gain control. Science. 1997, 275 (5297): 221-224. 10.1126/science.275.5297.221.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Prescott SA, DeKoninck Y: Gain control of firing rate by shunting inhibition: roles of synaptic noise and dendritic saturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100 (4): 2076-2081. 10.1073/pnas.0337591100.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dobrunz LE, Stevens CF: Heterogeneity of release probability, facilitation and depletion at central synapses. Neuron. 1997, 18: 995-1008. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80338-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Migliore M, Shepherd GM: Emerging rules for the distributions of active dendritic conductances. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002, 3: 362-370. 10.1038/nrn810.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.